Imaging Review of the Temporal Bone Part I

Review Article REVIEW ARTICLE

Open Admission

Across Tympanomastoidectomy: A Review of Less Common Postoperative Temporal Bone CT Findings

American Periodical of Neuroradiology November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6802

Abstract

SUMMARY: Postoperative temporal bone imaging after surgical procedures such as ossiculoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, cochlear implantation, and vestibular schwannoma resection is ofttimes encountered in clinical neuroradiology practice. Less common otologic procedures tin present diagnostic dilemmas, especially if access to prior operative reports is non possible. Lack of familiarity with the less common surgical procedures and expected postoperative changes may render radiologic interpretation challenging. This review illustrates cardinal imaging findings later surgery for Ménière disease, superior semicircular culvert dehiscence, temporal encephalocele repairs, internal auditory culvert decompression, active middle ear implants, jugular bulb and sigmoid sinus dehiscence repair, and petrous apicectomy.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AMEI: active heart ear acoustic implants
ELS: endolymphatic sac
LSC: lateral semicircular culvert
MCF: middle cranial fossa
PSC: posterior semicircular canal
SSC: superior semicircular canal
SSCD: superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Many neuroradiologists may be familiar with the imaging appearance of the middle and inner ear, internal auditory canal, and lateral skull base after common surgical procedures such every bit ossiculoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, cochlear implantation, and vestibular schwannoma resection.^one⇓-iii Less common otologic procedures can present diagnostic dilemmas, particularly if admission to prior operative reports is lacking. Neuroradiologists may not be aware of these surgical procedures either due to the decreasing numbers of these surgeries performed today or some of the newer surgeries confined to specialized academic centers and thus less commonly encountered in routine exercise. These postoperative temporal bone findings can have unique imaging features based on the type of surgical procedure and indication. Lack of familiarity with these surgical procedures and expected postoperative changes may render radiologic interpretation challenging. The purpose of this prototype-rich review is to illustrate less mutual postoperative temporal bone CT findings that neuroradiologists may see and would ideally be able to recognize and to differentiate from disease mimics. This review illustrates imaging findings after surgery for Ménière disease, superior semicircular canal dehiscence, temporal encephalocele repairs, internal auditory canal decompression, agile middle ear implants, jugular bulb and sigmoid sinus dehiscence repair, and petrous apicectomy.

Ménière Disease

Ménière affliction is characterized by recurrent attacks of episodic vertigo, fluctuating low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness. The pathophysiology is attributed to endolymphatic hydrops, a histologic finding in which the endolymphatic compartment including the scala media is dilated.⁴ Endolymph is the fluid within the bleary labyrinth, including the vestibule, semicircular canals, and scala media of the cochlea. Although the physiology is debated, the endolymphatic sac (ELS) is idea to maintain hydrostatic pressure and endolymph homeostasis for the inner ear, and its dysfunction may contribute to the pathophysiology of this affliction.⁵ While many patients reply well to lifestyle changes such equally low-salt diet and medical management with diuretics and betahistine, >20% of patients develop intractable Ménière illness. Handling options for these patients with medically refractory symptoms include intratympanic corticosteroid injection, gentamicin injection, and surgery. Surgical treatment may be classified as "nonablative" (in which inner ear function is preserved), including endolymphatic sac decompression, or "ablative" (in which inner ear role is lost), including labryinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy.^vi

ELS surgery, ie, either ELS decompression or ELS shunting, is a nonablative surgical option with moderate efficacy and little hazard to hearing.^{5,half dozen} The ELS is non direct visualized on CT imaging; one can, nonetheless, see the osseous margins of the vestibular aqueduct, which encase the bleary endolymphatic duct. On MR imaging, the endolymphatic duct that opens into the ELS at the operculum can be readily identified as a T2WI hyperintense structure. The location of the ELS is inferred at the last finish of the endolymphatic duct at the dura of the posterior cranial fossa and just behind the posterior semicircular canal (PSC) (Fig ane).⁷ The Donaldson line is a useful surgical landmark to identify the ELS during ELS decompression. This line is fatigued along the long axis of the lateral semicircular culvert (LSC) bisecting the PSC. The estimated location of the ELS is just anterior and junior to the junction of this line and the sigmoid sinus. The surgical steps of ELS decompression comprise a wide culvert wall-up mastoidectomy with decompression of the sigmoid sinus and the presigmoid dura, often referred to as the Trautman triangle. The ELS is identified equally a thickening of dura mater posterior to the PSC and is sub sequently widely decompressed without inadvertent durotomy. Additional shunt placement is optional and has largely fallen by the wayside.^8,9 On postoperative imaging, surgical changes of ELS decompression contain of culvert wall-upward mastoidectomy, which farther extends upwards to the posterior osseous cortex with presigmoid dura decompression. Removal of the bone immediately posterior and inferior to the PSC and vestibular channel indicates skillful surgical exposure of the ELS. Identifying the posterior extent of the mastoidectomy margin and exposure of the presigmoid dura differentiates this procedure from a simple cortical mastoidectomy (Fig 2).

FIG 1.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG one.

Beefcake of the endolymphatic duct and sac on axial (A and B) and Pöschl view (C and D) CT and 3D fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR images. The endolymphatic duct connects with the endolymphatic sac. Both structures are not directly seen on CT, but CT shows the osseous vestibular aqueduct that houses the endolymphatic duct (block arrows, A and C). Note the location of vestibular channel extending to the cortex of the posterior temporal bone (block arrow, A). On MR imaging, the endolymphatic duct tin can be seen directly equally a T2WI hyperintense tubular structure (cake arrows, B and D), extending inferiorly beneath the dura of the posterior cranial fossa at the expected location of endolymphatic sac (white arrow, D). Note the close proximity of the posterior semicircular culvert (black arrows on CT and dotted white arrow on MR imaging), an of import anatomic landmark to place the endolymphatic sac intraoperatively.

FIG 2.

Download effigy
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 2.

Endolymphatic sac decompression (A) versus mastoidectomy (B). A, Transmastoid endolymphatic sac shunt surgery: Postoperative changes of right canal wall-up mastoidectomy (asterisk). The posterior margins of the mastoidectomy defect extend up to the presigmoid osseous plate at the expected location of the endolymphatic sac (solid white pointer shows the location of transmastoid endolymphatic sac shunting). Removal of the bone overlying the posterior semicircular canal (black pointer) and vestibular channel (dotted white arrow) indicates skilful surgical exposure of the endolymphatic sac. The silastic shunt is not directly visualized on CT. B, For comparison, an epitome from some other patient with a simple canal wall-up mastoidectomy and ossiculoplasty for chronic otitis media. Annotation the mastoidectomy defect (asterisk) and the intact posterior cortex (solid white arrow) overlying the posterior semicircular canal (blackness arrow) and vestibular aqueduct (dotted white pointer).

While no longer performed today, sacculotomy via the Cody tack procedure is a surgery for Ménière affliction that was initially popularized in the early 1970s. The premise behind the process was that an internal shunt between the endolymphatic and perilymphatic compartments may alleviate excess pressure inside the membranous labyrinth. Surgically, a prosthetic tack is introduced through the footplate of the stapes that will puncture the saccule whenever saccular dilation occurs, thereby providing "automatic repetitive sacculotomy" (Fig 3).¹⁰ On CT, this should not exist mistaken for vestibular migration of an ossicular prosthesis, nearly commonly a stapes prosthesis. The stapes is normal and intact in patients with sacculotomy hardware, in contradistinction to those with migrated stapes prostheses after stapedectomy procedures for otosclerosis (Fig 3).

FIG 3.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 3.

Sacculotomy (A) versus stapes prosthesis migration (B). A, Sacculotomy with insertion of a Cody tack prosthesis. Oblique CT epitome reformatted forth the long axis of the stapes (A) shows a linear metallic device in the saccule (dotted white arrow). This was a Cody tack device for a sacculotomy. Note the intact stapes (solid white arrow). B, Vestibular migration of stapes prosthesis. Oblique CT image reformatted along the long centrality of the stapes (D) shows that the stapes suprastructure is replaced past a prosthesis (solid white arrow), with intrusion of the prosthesis into the vestibule.

Surgical labyrinthectomy is performed for intractable Ménière disease later on exhaustion of more bourgeois nonablative procedures and in patients with poor residual hearing. The goal of labyrinthectomy is to destroy the labyrinthine neuroepithelium and thereby eliminate faulty vestibular stimuli from the diseased ear.¹¹ Several surgical approaches can be used to perform labyrinthectomy. Some authors advocate a transcanal approach through the external auditory canal, whereby the incus and stapes are removed to access the entrance hall. More usually, the transmastoid approach is used, in which a canal wall-upwardly mastoidectomy is performed, the 3 semicircular canals are exenterated, and the vestibule is cleaned of neuroepithelium.^12,13 Surgical labyrinthectomy for any indication may lead to labyrinthitis ossificans and, much less unremarkably, CSF leak or facial nervus injury. In patients with surgical labyrinthectomy, air in the labyrinth is considered an expected finding; therefore, these cases should non be mistaken for traumatic or other acquired causes of perilymph fistula or pneumolabyrinth (Fig 4).

FIG 4.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 4.

Surgical labyrinthectomy with cochlear labyrinthitis ossificans. Axial CT prototype (A) of the left temporal bone shows changes of prior transmastoid endolymphatic sac surgery (dotted white arrow), with a mastoidectomy defect extending posteriorly to the expected location of the endolymphatic sac. Postoperative changes of the afterwards performed hearing-ablative surgical labyrinthectomy are seen every bit surgical removal of bone overlying the lateral semicircular canal with a fistulous connectedness between the lateral semicircular canal and the mastoid defect (solid white arrow, A). Air also extends to the superior semicircular canal (solid white arrow, B). A more than caudal image (C) shows mineralization inside the basal turn of the cochlea (black arrow, C), consistent with labyrinthitis ossificans, an expected postoperative finding post-obit labyrinthectomy.

Semicircular Culvert Dehiscence

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is characterized past thinning of the osseous covering overlying the superior semicircular canal. Due to the dehiscence, there is a directly communication betwixt bleary labyrinth and the overlying dura or superior petrosal sinus, leading to a "third window phenomenon," ie, abnormal dissipation of audio/pressure waves through the dehiscence. Clinically, a third window phenomenon is characterized by various signs such autophony (ie, prominently hearing one'southward own voice in the affected ear), sound- or pressure-induced vertigo and/or nystagmus (Tullio miracle and the Hennerbert sign, respectively), pulsatile tinnitus, and low-frequency conductive hearing loss with negative bone-conduction thresholds.^13,14 The diagnosis of SSCD tin can be suggested on heavily T2-weighted MR images just is best made on high-resolution axial and oblique reformatted CT views. On the Pöschl view (ie, images reformatted perpendicular to the long axis of petrous os), SSCD is characterized by an absent or thinned-out osseous covering overlying the superior semicircular canal (SSC). On the Stenvers view (ie, images reformatted parallel to the long axis of petrous bone), SSCD is characterized past parallel or diverging walls of the SSC as they approach the floor of the middle cranial fossa (MCF).^xv

Surgeries for SSCD are directed toward repair of the dehiscence past canal plugging, resurfacing, or combinations thereof.¹⁶ Both transmastoid and MCF approaches have been described with a >ninety% success charge per unit (Table).^17,18 Examples of materials used include os wax, bone chips, and temporalis fascia for canal plugging and cartilage, bone, temporalis fascia, and hydroxyapatite os cement for resurfacing.¹⁷ Most patients practice not need imaging after SSCD repair. CT or MR imaging is typically performed in those patients with persistent vertigo or suspected contralateral dehiscence.^xv Postoperative imaging findings differ on the basis of the material used and the procedure performed. If the SSC has been plugged with bone cement or if in that location is secondary labyrinthitis ossificans, the occluded semicircular canal segment may announced hyperattenuating on CT. However, both bone wax and fascia are radiolucent materials and not direct visualized on CT. Thus, on postoperative CT, in that location may exist persistent or greater thinning of bone overlying the SSC. This should non be mistaken for persistent SSCD or surgical failure if the patient is asymptomatic (Fig 5). Compared with CT, MR imaging can better depict SSC plugging by loss of T2WI hyperintensity within the semicircular canal. Other postoperative findings may include temporal lobe encephalomalacia due to retraction of the temporal lobe during the MCF approach.¹⁵

FIG 5.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG five.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence repair through a eye cranial fossa approach (A and B) and transmastoid approach (C and D). Preoperative Pöschl view (A) shows dehiscence of the mid-third of the left superior semicircular canal (solid white arrow). A middle cranial fossa approach (dotted white arrow, B) was used to plug the superior semicircular canal with bone wax and temporalis fascia. Postoperative CT (B) shows further loss of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal due to drilling of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal to plug it (solid white arrow). Os wax and temporalis fascia are radiolucent and not direct seen on CT. Postoperative changes of middle cranial fossa repair can be missed on temporal bone CT if not specifically sought and in the absence of clinical details. Preoperative CT (C) shows a large left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (solid white arrow). A transmastoid approach (dotted white arrows, D) was used to access the roof of the superior semicircular canal and plug information technology with bone wax and temporalis fascia. There is expected soft tissue in the mastoidectomy defect without evidence of otitis media (not shown). Pre-op indicates preoperative; Mail-op, postoperative.

Surgical approaches for superior semicircular culvert dehiscence repair^{^a}

Round window occlusion is some other minimally invasive approach for semicircular culvert dehiscence handling. This is performed through a transcanal arroyo and can exist done as an outpatient surgery. Occluding or reinforcing the circular window with autologous fabric tin can pb to symptom improvement by eliminating the third window event, merely information technology may too contribute to a conductive hearing loss. Although this surgery is a less-invasive treatment option for these patients, it has less efficacy compared with directly dehiscence repair.¹⁹ Postoperative imaging shows soft tissue obliterating the normal air-filled round window niche (Fig vi). This should not be mistaken for middle ear illness such as glomus tympanicum or cholesteatoma on imaging. Occlusion of the round window is also offered to patients with a localized perilymph fistula (spontaneous, traumatic, or secondary to erosive middle ear disease).²⁰ This can look similar to round window occlusion for semicircular canal dehiscence and again should non be mistaken for middle ear disease.

FIG 6.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 6.

Transcanal occlusion of the round window for superior semicircular canal dehiscence. A patient with bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence underwent bilateral transcanal occlusion of the round windows with cartilage graft and fascia. Postoperative axial CT epitome of the right temporal bone (A) shows nodular soft tissue in the round window niche (white arrow). A normal circular window niche is air-filled compared with that of a good for you patient (blackness pointer, B). Intraoperative paradigm (C) shows a round window subsequently occlusion with fascia/cartilage graft (white arrow), compared with that of a healthy patient (black arrow, D).

Isolated lateral semicircular canal dehiscence is rare. Defects in the LSC are more than likely due to erosion secondary to infectious, inflammatory, or neoplastic conditions.¹³ Very rarely, a radiologist may run into a patient who underwent a remote LSC fenestration for otosclerosis. In LSC fenestration, an opening is fabricated in the lateral semicircular canal through the mastoid; imaging findings can exist mistaken for lateral semicircular canal dehiscence or LSC fistula if ane is not aware of this procedure (Fig 7). Because this procedure is now replaced by more effective stapedotomy/stapedectomy procedures, these imaging findings are expected to exist found simply in patients with remote surgeries.

FIG 7.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 7.

Postoperative changes of lateral semicircular canal fenestration performed for otosclerosis. Axial CT image shows lucency effectually the cochlea (the "double ring" sign) (dotted white arrow, A) consistent with retrofenestral otosclerosis. Postoperative axial (B) and coronal (C) CT images show an osseous defect over the lateral margin of lateral semicircular canal (solid white arrows) due to surgical fenestration of the lateral semicircular canal. This should non be mistaken for a lateral semicircular culvert fistula. Note the associated mastoidectomy defect (asterisk).

Temporal Encephaloceles and CSF Leak

Temporal meningoceles or encephaloceles secondary to skull base dehiscence may exist congenital, posttraumatic, iatrogenic, or secondary to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri).²¹ Studies accept shown an clan between SSCD and temporal meningoencephaloceles in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.²² The pathophysiology of both meningoencephaloceles and SSCD is attributed to the thinning of the skull base and the roof of the SSC due to raised intracranial pressure. Raised intracranial pressure can also lead to CSF leaks.¹³ Surgical approaches for skull base dehiscence repairs include transmastoid and MCF approaches. The transmastoid approach is preferred for smaller defects and defects inside the tegmen mastoideum, while the MCF approach is used for defects that are larger, multiple, or in the tegmen epitympanum or petrous apex.²³ Repair materials nigh commonly include fascia and bone grafts and, less usually, bone cement. In those patients with concomitant SSCD, dehiscence repair can exist performed at the time of meningoencephalocele repair (Fig viii). It is also recommended to await for meningoencephaloceles and SSCD on the contralateral side because bilateral interest is relatively common in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.²¹

FIG 8.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 8.

Temporal meningoencephalocele repair and superior semicircular canal dehiscence plugging complicated by CSF leak in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Preoperative coronal CT of correct temporal bone (A) shows a defect in the tegmen tympani. Soft tissue extends through the defect into the correct eye ear (solid white arrow, A). Pöschl view (B) shows dehiscence of the mid-portion of the right superior semicircular culvert (black arrow, B). Postoperative images testify changes of right center culvert fossa repair with the bone and fascia graft held downward with plate screws (black arrow, C). The right SSC was plugged with bone wax in the same setting, and the roof was resurfaced with fascia graft, better appreciated on the heavily T2-weighted MR imaging (D), which shows the expected focal loss of fluid signal in the right SSC at the site of plugging (dotted white arrow, D). Postoperatively, the patient developed a CSF leak requiring additional surgical repair (solid white arrow, C). The patient also had a small encephalocele on the left side (not shown) consequent with intracranial hypertension. Post-op indicates postoperative.

Internal Auditory Canal Decompression

Internal auditory canal decompression is commonly performed for vestibular schwannoma to admission the tumor but may also exist used to treat osseous dysplasias of the temporal os that are associated with progressive narrowing of the internal auditory canals leading to auditory, vestibular, or facial nerve dysfunction. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia and Camurati-Engelmann illness (progressive diaphyseal dysplasia) are two such examples that may necessitate internal auditory canal decompression due to seventh and eighth cranial nerve deficits.^24,25 Compressive furnishings may too be noted on other skull base foramina, cranial nerves, vessels, and encephalon stem. In these patients, internal auditory canal decompression is performed through the MCF approach to remove the superior and the anterior portions of the petrous bone. On postoperative imaging, one should evaluate the capability of internal auditory canal decompression, which should ideally include the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve, and ensure that the arcuate eminence (the bone overlying the SSC) is intact (Fig ix). Unfortunately, long-term follow-up may show heterotopic or dystrophic ossification, necessitating revision decompression surgeries.

FIG 9.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 9.

Internal auditory canal decompression for Camurati-Engelmann affliction. Upper row: Preoperative CT images (A–C) in a patient with Camurati-Engelmann disease show extensive osseous skull base of operations thickening and near-complete obliteration of both internal auditory canals (left > correct) (solid white arrows, A). Coronal images (B and C) show marked narrowing of both internal auditory canals (dotted white arrows), more and so medially where the porus acousticus is nearly obliterated due to hypertrophic osseous overgrowth of the walls of internal auditory canals (solid white arrows). Lower row: Postoperative CT images (D–F) show widely patent internal auditory canals bilaterally (solid white arrows, D). Coronal images (E and F) show decompression of the internal auditory canals by removal of the superior and anterior portions of the petrous bones (solid white arrows). The black polygon in C depicts the portion of the os removed through the middle cranial fossa arroyo to decompress the internal auditory canal. Intendance is taken to preserve the arcuate eminence over the superior semicircular canal (black arrows, C and F).

Implantable Active Middle Ear Acoustic Implants

Implantable active heart ear acoustic implants (AMEI) are alternatives to hearing aids in accordingly selected patients. These may be offered to patients with variable severity of conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing loss who cannot wear hearing aids due to infection or defects or atresia of the external auditory canal or who do not wish to clothing hearing aids for cosmesis.^26,27 These implants transduce audio-visual audio free energy to the cochlear perilymph either through skull vibration via the temporal bone cortex or via the ossicular chain. These differ from passive heart ear implants such as an ossicular reconstruction prosthesis. They also differ from cochlear implants or auditory encephalon stem implants that directly simulate the cochlear nerve or brain stem nuclei, respectively.²⁸ There are a variety of AMEIs available, some of which are FDA approved in the Us while others are available in Europe.²⁶ From an imaging perspective, it is important for radiologists not to mistake AMEIs for cochlear implants on postoperative CT. A primary distinguishing feature is that a cochlear implant will take an electrode within the cochlear lumen that typically extends to a minimum angular depth of 270° to 360°, whereas AMEIs volition non have an intracochlear component. Like to earlier cochlear implant designs, many AMEIs are not MR imaging conditional.

AMEIs tin can either exist partially implantable or fully implantable.²⁸ Partially implantable AMEIs take an external audio processor and an internal floating mass transducer. Partially implantable AMEIs can either have a fully external sound processor held by a magnet (eg, Vibrant Soundbridge; Med-EL) or an in-the-canal processor (eg, Maxum; Ototronix) (Fig 10).²⁸ The floating mass transducer can exist crimped to the long process of the incus or the stapes footplate or suprastructure or coupled to the round window. The floating mass transducer is stimulated by the processor, which, in turn, creates a mechanical vibration that results in perilymph fluid motion within the cochlea.²⁹ Thus, for proper operation, the implant must exist correctly coupled to the ossicular system or round window. Whatsoever interruption in the coupling of the floating mass transducer leads to device malfunction. The goal of postoperative imaging in these patients is to place the device components and the integrity of the coupling system (Fig 11).

FIG 10.

Download effigy
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG ten.

Normal active middle ear implant. Analogy of a partially implantable external audioprocessor (red pointer) fastened to the mastoid bone that transmits vibrations to an internal floating mass transducer (black arrow) coupled with the intact ossicular chain. Images used with permission of the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Inquiry. All rights reserved.

FIG 11.

Download effigy
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 11.

Dislodged floating mass transducer in a partially implantable active middle ear implant. Centric (A) and coronal (C) CT images show a dislodged floating mass transducer lying in the hypotympanum (dotted white arrows) instead of beingness attached to the stapes in the mesotympanum (solid white arrows, B, C). Postoperative photo (D) shows the surgically retrieved floating mass transducer.

In fully-implantable AMEIs (eg, Esteem; Envoy), the processor is internal and secured to the mastoid os. It has a sensor coupled to the body of the incus and a driver coupled to the stapes.³⁰ The incudostapedial joint is disarticulated at the fourth dimension of device implantation to carve up the sensor and the driver functions. Thus, incudostapedial disarticulation on postoperative CT is expected and should not exist interpreted equally pathologic decoupling or discontinuity (Fig 12).²⁸

FIG 12.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 12.

Expected CT findings in totally implantable AMEIs. Images bear witness the different components of the totally implantable Esteem AMEI. The CT sentry image shows the processor (solid white arrow) and split up internal sensor and commuter leads (dotted white arrows). Axial (B and D) and coronal (C) CT images show the sensor on the incudomalleolar joint (dotted white pointer, B), commuter on the stapes (dotted white arrow, C), and audioprocessor in the mastoid (solid white arrow, D). The incudostapedial articulation is disarticulated as part of the surgery (dashed white arrow, D) and should not be misdiagnosed equally fracture/failure.

Jugular Bulb and Sigmoid Sinus Dehiscence Repairs

Pulsatile tinnitus of venous origin may be caused by abnormalities in the jugular bulb or sigmoid sinus walls leading to jugular seedling or sigmoid sinus dehiscence.³¹ Jugular seedling dehiscence may be seen in patients with a high-riding jugular seedling. Dehiscence tin can atomic number 82 to an outpouching of the jugular vein forming a jugular diverticulum into the posterior hypotympanum. A large dehiscent jugular bulb is more mutual on the right side, where the jugular system is more commonly ascendant. Although often asymptomatic, on the basis of the location of jugular diverticulum or dehiscence, symptoms may include conductive hearing loss, pulsatile tinnitus, or brisk venous bleeding after myringotomy.³² Reconstruction of jugular bulb dehiscence with hydroxyapatite os cement or bone pate is an emerging surgical selection.³³ Sigmoid sinus dehiscence may also be seen in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with or without concomitant stenosis at the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction and the more laterally placed sigmoid sinus.³⁴ Recently, transmastoid repair for sigmoid sinus dehiscence has been described. This comprises a cortical mastoidectomy, which is further extended to the lateral wall of the sigmoid sinus. The dehiscent sigmoid sinus wall is and so reconstructed with bone pate or os cement. Other less preferred reconstruction materials include autologous bone graft or temporalis fascia.³¹ On imaging, it is important to recognize both pre- and postoperative findings to avoid misdiagnosis (Fig xiii). Postoperative imaging should also exist scrutinized for potential complications such equally deep cerebral venous thrombosis and mass effect on the sigmoid sinus or jugular bulb.³¹

FIG 13.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG xiii.

Jugular bulb dehiscence repair. Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) axial CT images in a patient with pulsatile tinnitus bear witness osseous dehiscence at the lateral margin of the high-riding right jugular bulb, with a diverticulum extending anteriorly to the tympanic annulus (solid black arrow, A). Intraoperatively, a bone pate was harvested from the mastoid cortex and used to encompass the high-riding jugular seedling and jugular diverticulum. This is seen as hyperattenuating textile at the tympanic annulus and external auditory culvert on the postoperative CT (dotted blackness pointer, B).

Petrous Apicectomy

The petrous apex is anatomically complex and i of the least attainable areas of the skull base. It is decumbent to a diversity of pathologies such as petrous apicitis, cholesterol granuloma, epidermoid, mucocele, and tumors.³⁵ Surgical drainage of the petrous noon is considered in the setting of locally compressive symptoms or in petrous apicitis with Gradenigo syndrome (triad of retro-orbital pain, otorrhea, and abducens nerve palsy).^35,36 Multiple surgical approaches take been described reflecting the anatomic complexity and the intent of the performance (ie, biopsy, drainage, or removal) and to safeguard the various vascular and neural structures in this region. The 3 most ordinarily used approaches are transmastoid retrolabyrinthine, transcanal infracochlear, and extended center cranial fossa.¹² In the transmastoid infralabyrinthine arroyo, the surgical path extends below and posterior to the PSC, above the jugular bulb, and behind the facial nervus. In the infracochlear arroyo, the path extends through the external auditory canal, beneath the cochlea, and betwixt the petrous carotid canal and jugular seedling.¹² The role of postoperative imaging is based on the goals of the original option: identification of recurrence if performed for tumor resection or epidermoid, resolution of infection if performed for apicitis, or adequate drainage if performed for cholesterol granuloma (Fig 14).

FIG 14.

Download effigy
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

FIG 14.

Petrous apex drainage surgery in a patient with recurrent correct cholesterol granuloma. Predrainage CT image (A) shows a lesion expanding the petrous noon (solid white arrow) and extending to a prior postoperative mastoid defect (dotted white arrow). On T1-weighted MR imaging (B), the lesion is hyperintense (solid white arrow); it was besides T2WI hyperintense and nonenhancing (not shown), consistent with a cholesterol granuloma. C, Postoperative CT image afterwards drainage through a transmastoid infralabyrinthine arroyo shows the surgically created tract between the petrous and mastoid, allowing drainage of the petrous apex into the mastoid (double-headed white pointer). Pre-op indicates preoperative; Post-op, postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide spectrum of postoperative temporal os findings may be encountered in practise. Information technology is important non to misinterpret several expected postoperative findings for complications, surgical failure, or residual illness. Neuroradiologists' noesis of the surgical approaches, in improver to associated expected and unexpected postoperative findings, tin can reduce the run a risk of misdiagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic testing.

Footnotes

Paper previously presented as an Educational Exhibit at: Annual Coming together of the Radiological Society of North America, December i–6, 2019; Chicago, Illinois, and was awarded a Certificate of Merit.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
2.↵
iii.↵
iv.↵
v.↵
6.↵
7.↵
eight.↵
nine.↵
10.↵
11.↵
12.↵
13.↵
xiv.↵
fifteen.↵
xvi.↵
17.↵
xviii.↵
19.↵
twenty.↵
21.↵
22.↵
23.↵
24.↵
25.↵
26.↵
27.↵
28.↵
29.↵
30.↵
31.↵
32.↵
33.↵
34.↵
35.↵
36.↵

Received May 4, 2020.
Accepted after revision July xviii, 2020.

medeiroscosper59.blogspot.com

Source: http://www.ajnr.org/content/early/2020/11/05/ajnr.A6802